My number one pet peeve when
it comes to misuse of the English language is with the word "unique".
Hardly a day goes by that I don't hear someone (usually on TV) say "very
unique". I just heard it again from a scientist on Jimmy Fallon's Tonight
Show. When describing her butterfly robot she said, "It is very unique
technology." I wanted to scream....ARRGGGHHH!
There are no degrees of
"unique"! Something is either "unique" or it isn't. Let me
emphasize this again - THERE ARE NO DEGREES OF UNIQUE!!!
Okay, time to hop on my
grammar soapbox for this blog post. I pulled out my copy of "The Elements
of Style" by William Strunk, Jr. & E.B.White. Anyone who writes, for
fun or for a living, will likely have a copy of "The Elements of
Style". It is a skinny little book that addresses pretty much any question
a writer may have regarding rules of usage, composition & misused words or
expressions. It has stood the test of time - as far as I can tell from reading
the title page & introduction, it dates back to 1919.
Here is what "The
Elements of Style" says about the word "unique": "Means without
like or equal. Hence, there can be no degrees of uniqueness."
Examples from the book:
"It was the most unique
coffee maker available.", should be "It was a unique coffee
maker."
"The balancing act was
very unique.", should be "The balancing act was unique."
I hear intelligent, educated
people say "very unique" all the time & I want to yell at them,
"There are no degrees of unique! Unique doesn't need to be described."
I am by no means a card carrying member of the grammar police but this one
grates on me. I think we all have pet peeves that drive us just a tiny bit
crazy. What are yours?
I decided to look up one of
my lesser annoyances in "The Elements of Style" to see what their
take was on one of my dad's favorite words. For as long as I can remember my
father has used the word "irregardless". I always believed that it
should just be "regardless". As I typed this, low & behold, my spell checker flagged
"irregardless" as misspelled. I thought, "Yeah, because it's not
a word."
Pulling my well used
dictionary (next to my "The Elements of Style") from the shelf above
my computer, I discovered that Webster's defines "irregardless" as
"a substandard or humorous redundancy for regardless".
"The Elements of
Style" says "Irregardless should be regardless. The error results
from failure to see the negative in "less" & from a desire to get
it in as a prefix". So, there you have it - "You're wrong, Dad!"
I should probably go back
& read through the 95 pages of "The Elements of Style" again
since I am guilty of many of the rules brought up by the authors. I have a
tendency to use the word "so" too often (see above paragraph) when the book tells me to avoid it.
But I think the thing I need
to work on most is number 17 in the "Principles of Composition"
chapter - "Omit needless words". In the previous sentence I could
leave out "But I think" & "most" making it "The
thing I need to work on is number 17, etc. But I LIKE my needless words. They
feel needed to me. The shortened sentence sounds awfully boring to me. I've
always been a talker & tend to write that way, too. And don't even get me
started on commas.